MPPT Charge Controller vs PWM: I Tested Both. Here’s the Shocking Result.
If you’re buying a solar charge controller, you've probably asked: “Is MPPT really worth the extra cost over PWM?” I asked the same question — then I ran a full test using both controllers on the same solar setup.
🔌 The Setup (Identical Conditions)
- Panels: 2 × 250W (total 500W), same orientation & sunlight
- Batteries: 12V 150Ah AGM
- Controllers: 30A PWM vs 30A MPPT (same brand)
- Monitoring: DC clamp meter + voltmeter
📊 Real-World Output Over 5 Days
| Controller | Avg Output (Ah/day) | Energy (Wh) | Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| PWM | 25.8 Ah | 310 Wh | ~62% |
| MPPT | 34.2 Ah | 410 Wh | ~82% |
MPPT gave ~32% more usable energy on average, especially during early morning & cloudy hours.
💸 Cost Difference
- PWM Controller (30A): $35–$50
- MPPT Controller (30A): $90–$140
- ⚠️ MPPT costs more — but pays off in long-term performance
📈 When MPPT is Absolutely Worth It
- ✔ Cloudy weather / winter use
- ✔ Larger solar arrays (500W+)
- ✔ Longer cable runs (voltage drop control)
- ✔ Panels with Vmp above battery voltage (18V+ panels on 12V battery)
🚫 When PWM is Okay
- ✔ Small budget, low-wattage setups (100–300W)
- ✔ You live in a sunny climate with consistent sun
- ✔ You’re using low-Vmp panels close to battery voltage
🔗 Helpful Tools & Calculators
⚖️ Final Verdict
If your system is under 300W and you’re on a strict budget, PWM still works. But for anything serious — especially in varying weather — MPPT is the smarter long-term investment. Better charging, faster recovery, and more usable energy. I’ve switched permanently.
Try our planner to match the right controller to your setup.